A woman is getting some backlash after sharing that she's upset her mother-in-law got a tattoo of her kids' names without asking the woman or her husband first.
She woman wrote, “My husband came home from a visit to his mothers house and has told me that my MIL has got my children's names tattooed on her leg above her own children's names. I'm really annoyed as she did not ask for our permission! Both my husband & myself don't have tattoos and she knows how we felt when she 1st got a too [tattoo] with my husband's name on her.”
She asked if she was right to be annoyed and if her MIL should have asked first.
People did not hold back in letter her know that she was being ridiculous:
- “How bizarre that you think your MIL shouldn't have bodily autonomy."
- “It's her body. She's hardly gonna be stopped in the street by people demanding to know who the names represent. Get a grip."
- “She doesn't need to ask your permission. Who cares that Granny has a tattoo of her kids/grandkids names?"
- “I mean it's cheap and tacky and I would be cringing if it were my mum but there isn't anything you can do about it."
Whose' side are you on?